The Influence of the Culture of the Third Information Revolution on the Formation of Personality in the M. Serres Philosophical Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.1/257Keywords:
“hopthumb” personality, cultural space, virtual identity, culture of the younger generation, virtual communicative space, information society.Abstract
The research is aimed at outlining aspects of the influence of the achievements of the culture of the third information revolution on the formation of the young generation in the philosophical discourse of the French philosopher M. Serres, revealing the features of the achievements of the third information revolution of modern culture, in particular in the spatial, temporal and, in fact, human dimensions, their influence on the formation of personality of the “hopthumb”. The theoretical basis of the study is based on culturological and anthropological aspects of the influence of information and computer technology on the formation of personality, human self-awareness in the modern world. The methodology of M. Serres is used in the work. The scientific novelty of the proposed article is the analysis of the philosophical and pedagogical achievements of the French philosopher M. Serres, in particular, argued the presence in the scientific heritage of a famous contemporary doctrine of special characteristics and features of the modern young man, which the author calls " hopthumb" against the background of the formation of a new space of culture. In addition, the study of the theoretical constants of M. Serres made it possible to outline the signs of the third information revolution, to generalize and actualize the philosophical reflection on the self-identification of the individual in the new conditions. Based on the analysis of the work of the modern philosopher, the connection between the rapid achievements of the information revolution and the culture of younger generations was revealed and understood.
References
Baudrillard, J. (2006). Ot fragmenta k fragmentu [From fragment to fragment]. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya. https://www.libfox.ru/154273-zhan-bodriyyar-paroli-ot-fragmenta-k-fragmentu.html
Bauman, Z. (2005). Individualizirovannoe obshchestvo [Individualized society]. Moscow: Logos. https://www.twirpx.com/file/506864/
Bell, D. (1999). Gryadushchee postindustrialnoe obshchestvo [The upcoming post-industrial society]. Moscow: Academia. https://www.twirpx.com/file/682165/
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. A treatise on sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin Books. http://perflensburg.se/Berger%20social-construction-of-reality.pdf
Bourdieu, P. (2001). Prakticheskiy smysl [Practical meaning]. Saint Petersburg: Aleteyya. http://yanko.lib.ru/books/cultur/bourdieu-praktich_smusl-8l.pdf
Castells, M. (2000). Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo i kultura [Information age: economy, society and culture]. Moscow: GU- VShE. https://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Polit/kastel/index.php
Cooley, C. (1994). Sotsialnaya samost [The social self]. In V. I. Dobrenkov (Ed.), Amerikanskaya sotsiologicheskaya mysl: teksty [The Americam Sociological Thought: Texts] (pp. 320321). Moscow: MGU. https://www.twirpx.com/file/82813/
Darendorf, R. (2002). Sovremennyy sotsialnyy konflikt. Ocherk politiki svobody [Modern social conflict. Freedom policy essay.] Moscow: ROSSPEN. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01001864449
Deborah, G. (2018). Obshchestvo spektaklya [Society of performance]. Moscow: Opustoshitel. https://www.podpisnie.ru/books/obschestvo-spektaklya/
Deleuze, J. (2015). Immanentnost: zhizn [Immanence: a life]. Retrieved from http://dironweb.com/klinamen/fila15.html.
Derrida, J., & Stiegler, B. (2002). Echographies of television. Filmed interviews. Cambridge: Polity Press. https://www.twirpx.com/file/1723662/
Eco, U. (2009). Vertigo. Krugovorot obrazov, ponyatiy, predmetov [Vertigo: the cycle of images, concepts, objects]. Moscow: Slovo. https://www.yakaboo.ua/vertigo-krugovorot-obrazov-ponjatij-predmetov.html
Foucault, M. (2015). Nadzirat i nakazyvat: rozhdenie tyurmy [Supervise and punish: the birth of a prison]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press. https://www.litmir.me/br/?b=98365&p=1
Gergen, K. J., & Hosking, D. M. (2006). If you meet social construction along the road: a dialogue with Buddhism. In M. G. T. Kwee, K. J. Gergen, & F. Koshikawa (Eds.), Horizons in Buddhist Psychology: Practice, Research and Theory (pp. 299314). Chagrin Falls, Ohio: Taos Institute Publications. https://www.swarthmore.edu/sites/default/files/assets/documents/kenneth-gergen/horizons-buddhist-psych.pdf
Giddens, E. (2011). Posledstviya sovremennosti [The consequences of modernity]. Moscow: Praksis. https://www.twirpx.com/file/1132381/
Goffman, I. (2003). Analiz freymov: esse ob organizatsii povsednevnogo opyta [Frame analysis: an essay on organizing everyday experience]. Moscow: Institut sotsiologii RAN. https://platona.net/load/knigi_po_filosofii/sociologija/gofman_i_analiz_frejmov_ehsse_ob_organizacii_povsednevnogo_opyta_2004/25-1-0-1796
Huntington, S. (2003). Stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy [The clash of civilizations]. Moscow: AST. http://yanko.lib.ru/books/politologiya/huntington-stolk_civil-a.htm
Lakan, J. (2006). Seminary. Kniga VII. Etika psikhoanaliza [Seminars. Book 7. Ethics of psychoanalysis]. Moscow: Gnozis. https://www.twirpx.com/file/990117/
Masuda, Y. (1980). The information society as post-industrial society. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers. https://www.amazon.com/Information-Society-Post-Industrial/dp/0930242157
Mead, G. H. (1964). Selected writings. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo5953188.html
Nietzsche, F. (2015). Po tu storonu dobra i zla [On the other side of good and evil]. Moscow: Azbuka. https://www.yakaboo.ua/ak-non-fiction-nicshe-f-po-tu-storonu-dobra-i-zla.html
Serres, M. (2009). Tolko krasota nas spaset [Only beauty will save us]. Vestnik Evropy [Journal of Europe], 26. Retrieved from http://magazines.russ.ru/vestnik/2009/26/se31.html.
Serres, M. (2016a). O pokolenii “mutantov” [On the generation of “mutants”]. Retrieved from https://fly-uni.org/stati/mishel-serr-o-pokolenii-mutantov/
Serres, M. (2016b). Sovremennye tekhnologii [Modern technologies]. Retrieved from https://batenka.ru/aesthetics/reading/serres/.
Skorik, G. (2007). Chelovek v informatsionnom obshchestve: problema identifikatsii (poiska identichnosti) [Man in the information society: the problem of identification (identity search)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Journal of Tomsk State University], 302, 2436. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/chelovek-v-informatsionnom-obschestve-problema-identifikatsii-poiska-identichnosti
Sloterdijk, P., & Khaynrike, G. (2015). Solntse i smert: dialogicheskie issledovaniya [The sun and death: dialogue studies]. Saint Petersburg: Izdatelstvo Ivana Limbakha. https://www.yakaboo.ua/solnce-i-smert-dialogicheskie-issledovanija.html
Toffler, E. (2001). Shok budushchego [Shock of the future]. Moscow: AST. https://gtmarket.ru/library/basis/4797/4798
Virilio, P. (2002). Informatsionnaya bomba. Strategiya obmana [Information bomb. Cheating strategy.] Moscow: Gnozis. http://www.lib.ru/POLITOLOG/virilio.txt
Zakovorotnaya, M. (1999). Identichnost cheloveka. Sotsialno-filosofskie aspekty [Human identity. Socio-philosophical aspects]. Rostov-on-Don: Izdatelstvo of Severo-Kavkazskogo nauchogo tsentra vysshey shkoly. https://www.twirpx.com/file/154925/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
